2/15/2024 0 Comments Mac battery status service battery![]() ![]() Nevertheless, I will not treat them as limiting the President’s constitutional discretion to articulate the views of the United States before international organizations and with foreign governments. Indeed, I do not necessarily oppose many of the objectives in these provisions. Kerry) and will make every effort to take action consistent with these provisions. I recognize that “t is not for the President alone to determine the whole content of the Nation’s foreign policy” (Zivotofsky v. I believe the Congress shares this understanding, and my Administration will presume that it is incorporated into statutory reporting requirements of the kind at issue in the Act.Ī number of provisions of the Act may, in certain circumstances, interfere with the exercise of the President’s constitutional authority to articulate the positions of the United States in international negotiations or fora including sections 825(c)(1), 1013(b), 1255(b)(2), 1256(c)(2), 1305, 1309(a), 1518(a), 5411(a), 5602(c), and 6406. Accordingly, it has been the common practice of the executive branch to comply with statutory reporting requirements in a way that satisfies congressional needs pursuant to the traditional accommodation practice and consistent with due regard for the protection from unauthorized disclosure of classified information relating to sensitive intelligence sources and methods or other exceptionally sensitive matters, as well as to preserve the confidentiality of internal executive branch deliberations, particularly those with respect to decisions bearing on the Nation’s national security. At the same time, congressional committees have legitimate needs to perform vital oversight and other legislative functions with respect to national security and military matters. The Constitution vests the President with the authority to prevent the disclosure of such highly sensitive information in order to discharge his responsibility to protect the national security. Moreover, certain provisions of the Act raise constitutional concerns or questions of construction.Ĭertain provisions of the Act, including sections 856(c), 1221(a)(7), 1269, 1687, 7315, and 7351 would require the President and other officials to submit reports and plans to committees of the Congress that will, in the ordinary course, include highly sensitive classified information, including information that could reveal critical intelligence sources or military operational plans or could implicate executive branch confidentiality interests. I urge the Congress to eliminate these restrictions as soon as possible. In some circumstances, these provisions could make it difficult to comply with the final judgment of a court that has directed the release of a detainee on writ of habeas corpus, including by constraining the flexibility of the executive branch with respect to its engagement in delicate negotiations with foreign countries over the potential transfer of detainees. It is the longstanding position of the executive branch that these provisions unduly impair the ability of the executive branch to determine when and where to prosecute Guantánamo Bay detainees and where to send them upon release. Section 1031 likewise would continue to prohibit the use of such funds to transfer Guantánamo Bay detainees into the United States. Section 1033 of the Act continues to bar the use of funds appropriated to the Department of Defense to transfer Guantánamo Bay detainees to the custody or effective control of certain foreign countries. While I am pleased to support the critical objectives of the NDAA, I note that certain provisions of the Act raise concerns. ![]() My Administration looks forward to working with the Congress on the reauthorization of this vital national security authority as soon as possible in the new year. I also thank the Congress for its extension of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. ![]() The Act provides the critical authorities we need to build the military required to deter future conflicts, while supporting service members and their spouses and families who carry out that mission every day. The Act authorizes fiscal year appropriations principally for the Department of Defense, Department of Energy national security programs, Department of State, and the Intelligence Community. 2670, the “National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2024” (the “Act”). Get Involved Show submenu for “Get Involved””.The White House Show submenu for “The White House””.Office of the United States Trade Representative.Office of Science and Technology Policy.Executive Offices Show submenu for “Executive Offices””.Administration Show submenu for “Administration””.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |